EVE Search - A looter's trick that circumvents suspect timers.

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

A looter's trick that circumvents suspect timers.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2648	Posted - 2016.07.19 13:40:19 - [1] - Quote Anti ganking back at what they are doing best: crying on the forums. Thanks for your tears OP the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2648	Posted - 2016.07.19 15:01:12 - [2] - Quote afk phone wrote: Ima Wreckyou wrote: Anti ganking back at what they are doing best: crying on the forums. Thanks for your tears OP If you take a step back and look at the big picture. They are changing the game in ways that are ruining the way you choose to play it. They aren't actually whining, they are a slow methodical steam roller that is outright flattening you play style. Don't call them whiners, call them winners! (it's more accurate) Delicious! Not sure why you call whining to the developers to change the game because you are to bad at it to win if they don't change it in your favor is winning. Must be some new thing from another generation. Also just to be clear, I am almost always in favor of the ideas the anti-gankers bring up to fix something, since they are usually so stupid it would completely break the game in a way that would allow us to wreck highsec even more. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2648	Posted - 2016.07.19 15:06:02 - [3] - Quote Dirty Forum Alt wrote: Ima Wreckyou wrote: ...in a way that would allow us to wreck highsec even more. Wait...I thought you guys were saving high sec... dreams shattered Obviously we are saving highsec. Unfortunately it is in such a state that we have to burn it down first and then rebuild from scratch. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2648	Posted - 2016.07.19 16:41:44 - [4] - Quote Kip Winger wrote: Ima Wreckyou wrote: Also just to be clear, I am almost always in favor of the ideas the anti-gankers bring up to fix something, since they are usually so stupid it would completely break the game in a way that would allow us to wreck highsec even more. Wreck highsec... quite the drama you make up! Cats and Dogs living together. Wrath of god! Tears are absent of this post, just there desire to make the game fair for gankers and for everyone else. You must be new and don't understand how this works. Threads calling for nerfs or buffs to your specific playstyle because you can't cut it with the current rules are by definition tears. Not to be confused with concerns about upcoming changes not yet in the game which is something completely different. You anti-ganker seam to confuse the two a lot. Well you are so bad in the game why should it be different in the forums... Having experienced multiple nerf iterations I can tell you how this will work out. You obviously expect everything will stay the same and you get a bunch of yellow haulers to kill. That's not what will happen. In the best case scenario the gankers will adapt, everything will be more or less the same and you will be back on the forums crying for the next nerf. That is how it usually works. In any other case it will most likely introduce a new game mechanic which is confusing or completely unknown to most people except those who actually care about how the game works, like for example the "gankers", and which can potentially be used against all the carebears who did not bother to read the patch notes in the first place. Like the options? not? why not start to work with the current game mechanics today? If anti-ganking would actually do something and not constantly lose and seriously suck at the game we wouldn't have another thread about wreck looting since the hauler would still be alive. This whole thread is a testament to your inability to actually prevent ganks. I mean all you can do is whore on CONCORD killmails for ships who will be killed by NPCs anyway. I don't believe for a second that you will actually shoot if the looter is in something else than a noob ship. You will probably start crying fo NPC assistance against suspect targets or something. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2662	Posted - 2016.07.23 22:12:12 - [5] - Quote Brokk Witgenstein wrote: more perspective. When us nullsec duders blow up an Orca, a DST or a Freighter, we too have to hold the field long enough for our loot truck to arrive. Our truck is at considerable risk doing so- why isn't yours? Special snowflake needs special treatment? Highsec rules already are really soft on you; if you can't stand the idea of people actually shooting at your industrial, maybe EvE is not for you. The transport for the loot has the exact same risk the original Freighter had, similar to the scenario in nullsec. It's just that CONCORD "protects" both ships in Highsec. Anti-ganking is perfectly free to shoot at the industrial, I don't think someone has a problem with that or cries for special protection. On the contrary, anti-ganking is here crying for a special snowflake rule to get an easy kill without sacrificing ships to CONCORD. It does not even matter if they get what they want. The issue is not the current game mechanic, it's players like the op who are so bad at EVE they always cry for more changes in their favor. If CCP carebro enters the thread and brings forth that they implement said special snowflake mechanic to "balance" something you can bet it will take them only a few minutes to create the next thread full of tears about the next thing they think is the problem why they suck so much. This "one more nerf"-thing is going on for years and they eventually always get what they want because of how hard they cry. You say the highsec rules are "soft on us"?? Why do you think that is the case? A decade of carebear tears, that's why. And you can't really blame us if we then take those rules and use them for our own advantage. For example, why is it so hard to kill a DST? CONCORD buffs, tank buff, who was asking for that and is now crying that we can use them too? the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
Ima Wreckyou The Conference Elite CODE. 2663	Posted - 2016.07.23 23:58:13 - [6] - Quote Maybe I was not clear enough. It really does not matter if they implement it. As mentioned before several times, the problem is not the game mechanic. It is just plain stupid to expect that changing this will mean the looter will somehow have his hauler at risk. Obviously he will just use a different tactic to mitigate risk, the same way as it is done now with the noob ship. See you in the next nerf thread. the Code ALWAYS wins Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.